Regarding previously said, a problem of information note and form of description ,extrovert and inner ,introvert world is based upon existence of information code ,as  subject determination basic feature in the moment of “technological “ description ,which is related to certain object, or substantive analytical examination in relation with the same object. What appears  to be essential is whether the  information evolved from technological advancement  or it has been defined  by its own existence .For instance, Is the informational capacity ,measured in bytes and regarding technological advancement  and subject of research taken randomly, more determinate to analyst  rather than  to  its  inventor? Informational determination capacity is proportional to analytical decoding , just as the content of dream is to conscious. Technical measurement ,which is to determinate the subject informational more precisely ,directly affects the informational code reproduction. Informational chain code  appears to be  essentially divergent in relation to any subject  being analysed ; its selfdetermination is unconditional only if out of experimental or any form of  perceptive range  .The problem  resembles subquantum  paradox which results in experimental conception –experimenter causes the result of experiment ,while on the grounds of experimental action   technical substratum  treats its  own field of analysis as artificial

Subquantum technology basics

Principles of quantum mechanics are based on the claim that the fundamental entity concerning all interactions  in nature is quantum, defined as form of indivisible unit carrying an absolute minimum of  energy .In a word,any process of interaction, emission or absorbing of all materials energetic conditions is exclusively  possible in form of infinitesimal quantum continuance .According to   theoretical  implications method , metaphysics and physics matches.

As a subject of research , subquantum level of nature is  being realistic ,not only metaphysicist, but also to physicist ,  regarding theoretical concepts. This aspect of nature  excels any range of scientific or any other form of perception .Basic reason is most simple: considering the fact that perception sphere is being modified inside the quantum instance of nature , in order  to implement any form of knowledge, it must be based upon    quantum “behaviour” of natural interactions. Realization of subquantum instance  theoretically implied, although its practical significance or experimental induction are impossible  .

Solid form of technological advancement interpretation and the way it emanates from nature ,speaking in terms of idealists, it shapes into a classical model of synthetic explanations, which defines the technological circle as formal, secondary characteristic of individual interactions with nature. Structure of technological image is exclusively based upon domain of interactive, process related, although its peculiarity absolutely can’t possibly be derived from natural substratum. The aspect o technological determination is added  to natural domain ,regarding  synthetic interaction with nature ,relation between technology and nature is,a s for these concepts of explanation ,immanent,e ssentially impracticable.A possibility stems from shaping, factual ,state which  subject reduces from nature influenced by technology.

Specification of technological advancement is concentrated to reducing the practical domain of technical implementation  considering the sphere of reality and perceptiveness.

Realization ,practicable and technical  is in direct connection to expectation of scientific theory principle which proves itself. Technology   evolved in just a few decades .Considering the fact that  technology raised, for instance, in nineteen forties the size limit was 10^-5 milimetres, while nowdays  contemporary science moved the limits towards 10^-10 meters or 10 ^-7 milimetres.T his is the domain of very popular nanotechnology .Quantum physics concept in a pretty self-confident way pleads with absolute influence to the real world of subatomic entity of nature ,although the theoretical  concept itself, regarding analytical method used  for its  definition, seems to be very self –destructive and fragile. Subquantum aspect of natural interactions, like absolute foundation of visible and invisible is theoretically and implicitly unpredictable in its adherence, which should be considered as variable; subquant  world  is not a subject to laws of  existing world, so should any discerning reader notice that ,according to conceptual explanations of interactive manifestations, certain processes should be assigned to a cathegory of principles semantics. In a word, It is necessary to find some law in illegal. Such conclusion  is a mind’s need, like a compromising relief in a visible defining process, but also a fundamental self-deceit of our own  world of phenomena  is in mind navigating  to functionality exclusively referring to cathegories of relational  .Pointing this problem  in a theoretical manner of explaining the subatomic, it is inevitable to say that our model of perception points out to specific “behaviour” of invisible world of subatomic level of nature. Related to our concept, this world has its own rules, essentially Imperceptible. It is possible to presume its  ” intensity “,inner essential determination ,although, according to its constitution, it is impracticable ,for it is not  connected  with factual world.

Poetical sentence  says: a shape whose appearance  exclusively stands for  itself , has no appearance at all. This problem is going to be mentioned  later on,regarding analysis of multidimensional   concept relation and relation of selfhood and the instance of consciousness.

Let’s make an assumption that result of technology advance is ,as mentioned, based upon structural minimization, deeper penetrating the natural infinity, regarding  as macro as mini entity, even though the practicality of technical advancement incorporates into substantial minimization, or division of manifesting world .As to this, what is the final result of technological advancement? Provided that subquantum  world represents fundamental entity of factual world, is the  subquantum  world itself a  metaresult of  technological circle?

Being incorporated into the fundamental range of natural, technology would turn the full the circle as non-spreading shape .Its inner substance would excel  the result of  the very evolution. Speaking of metaphysical poetry, it would be amazed by technology, not by its complexity, but for it excels the semantic  of pure determination as  a concrete being of practical world .From  the starting point, which is originally referring to practical approach to nature , it finds its own realization in substantive  influence on absolute entity of - world, to subquantum entity.  By  this process  technology would ,  closing the evolutionary circle, abandon the originality  of  physical world. Each   form of its prediction or attempt  on complementary defining would  appear to be unsuccessful. Synthetic form of  metaphysical incarnation  of technology would strengthen; nevertheless, this analyse intention is not to  establish  the horizon of its (technological) final revolution  as meta-aspect. Subquantum technology should ,by surpasing the applicable value, and regarding  qualitative peculiarity towards efficiency within natural complex, make transcendence  superior to categorizing. Forms of quantity and quality ,equalizing technological relation and natural ,become completely useless. Assumption of taking initiative action  implicates  a huge possibility of technological  meta determination of natural flow; every interaction, causal relation,any natural manifestation are  being modified by subquantum technology. Countless options of nanotechnology  in  virtual, parallel   reality construction appears to be essential regression concerning subquantum technology. Quality proportion would be enormously bigger between these two evolution aspects, than  between microprocessor and prehistoric stone axe. Provided that  nanotechnological field “resource” is 10^-10   meters, the aspect of subquantum might be extensively measurable by theoretical models. Essentially and structurally ,microdimensions of subquantum technology would not be determinate, according to upper definition, and intensity would not follow extension. This final” level “of technology would appear to sphere of perception  identical to entering the singularity.To our categories of cognition  it seems to be  incomprehensible , whereas it could be predicative according to existing theoretical models. Example of singularity,I n this case ,ought to be seen as compromising analogy, although  regarding the hypothetical case of final technological revolution ,it would be absolutely incomprehensible. Exceeding the quant limit would mean that technology in multidimensional frame absolutely alters space and time continuum ,even the genealogy concept og Universe would be absolutely changed, although this theoretical implication totally unacceptable in its essence .

Finalization of technological evolution understands ontological surpassing the world. Problem appears here, in state section ,on condition that finalization of evolution process understands own starting point transcendence ,sublimated in visible  macroplan of nature ,which is fundamental to changing  the essential form of existence. In a word, how can  a form, defined by technological  semantic ,practicable realization ,outdoes own form of existential determination  placing itself into  the aspect of absolute, subquantum. Metaphysical conflict is in the notion and also in the semantic of subquantum. If this entity himself reperesents  the absolute entity of nature, turning the full circle becomes expected. On condition that theoretical models  point out to interpreting suitability of subquantum as absolute, subquantum technology would be as far from the result  of infinitely successive circle of its own  evolution. This problem will be examined  synthetically highlighting  either the  notion multidimensionality and reduction of selfhood later on in the text.